Tuesday, February 28, 2012

W8: O'Betty's Review


When I was walking to O' Betty’s on Union, I did not know what to expect. All I heard was that they serve some of the best hot dogs around, which was not important to me because I never cared for hot dogs and do not eat them. When I walked in, I saw a counter with bar stools, a couple booths, and some small tables scattered throughout the tiny restaurant. The décor and atmosphere of O' Betty’s is tacky and cheesy to say the least, but that is what made it a fun place. A restaurant that serves hot dogs is not going to be complete with somber music, a water fountain, candles, and fancy table clothes. Instead its ceilings are decorated with fake roses. Its walls are decorated with old pictures of flappers, and its booths are of cheetah pattern material complete with cheetah-patterned pillows.

Everything was very informal. The servers dressed in regular clothes, and we could here the cooks laughing it up in the kitchen. The customers eating looked to be enjoying them selves, as they would talk loudly amongst the others sitting at their table. The servers were really good about taking down everyone’s order, filling up drinks, answering questions, and bringing the checks out in a fast and orderly manner. That was impressive considering the place was absolutely packed.

The food arrived really fast, between five and ten minutes per order. I can’t say personally how good the food was, but the walls were covered with awards for “best hot dog” from many years, including 2011. The people at my table who did order food seemed to really enjoy their meals. Words like “delicious” and “really good” and “the best hot dog I ever had” were being tossed around quite frequently at our table, and many said that they would definitely be returning for more hot dogs in the future. The food was also really cheap for the amount of portions each meal had. No wonder college kids love this place.

All in all, O' Betty’s is a great place for anyone who wants a delicious cheap hot dog. They also serve sausages, bratwurst, and a whole array of fries, ranging from plain to garlic, to spicy.  I must say, the food did look delicious, and I just might reconsider my stance of not liking hot dogs. At least until I try one of O' Betty’s famous wieners.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

W7 Food Inc. & the Persuasive Power of Film


The reason why people find Food Inc. persuasive is it provides solid facts and statistics that simply can’t be argued against. Not only is each statistic from a reputable source, but they are surprising and eye opening. People viewing the film for the first time learn so much about where the food they eat really comes from, the problems surrounding the industrialization of the food industry, and the dark side behind the FDA and big food corporations. By showing facts, graphs, statistics, and numbers, Food Inc. is able to logically persuade viewers.
                Also, by being produced by qualified filmmakers and having testimonies from real experts on the food industry, Food Inc. is able to be even more persuasive. This documentary isn’t some flick some college students made for a film class. This film is professional and legitimate, having a budget big enough to use helicopters for camera shots, and allow the crew to visit multiple sites to capture images from all over the U.S., including multiple feed lots and farms. People are actually able to see with their own two eyes what really is going on with their food at these farms and feed lots, so that visual makes it easy for people to believe what is being said by Food Inc. Each person being interviewed, from the farmers to the journalists, is credible enough to believe. They are not running for election, or trying to gain anything by appearing in the film. They are just trying to reveal the truth about the food industry. That cause persuades people to listen to what they are saying, and generally agree or empathize with them.
                I was persuaded by the film because of the statistics and visuals used, especially the ones used to show the chicken houses and feed lots. I think the impact the documentary varies for different people. Some people will watch the film and not think anything of it, while others may completely change their lifestyle. It really depends on the individual viewer, if they are appalled from what they see, or if they even have the means to afford a lifestyle change.  However, he film definitely makes people more aware and educated about the food industry and what they consume.
 Compared to other acts of persuasion, a film outdoes them all because of the capabilities. A lecture can be boring and uninteresting depending on the speaker, lots of people do not like to read news editorials, and speeches can be mundane. Films made by professionals with a decent budget can explore much more about the topic, and jam more information in a more entertaining way. Films can visit multiple locations, show multiple images, and stress multiple times in a flashier way. Just compare the theater and books to the film industry: more people are watching movies than going to plays or reading. Films can appeal to more people (especially ones with short attention spans). For this reason they are the most persuasive than other acts.

Sunday, February 19, 2012

W6 Odd Foods


Ever look at a certain food and wonder what the first person was thinking when he decided to put that food in his mouth and eat it? In other words, have you ever found it odd that people eat a certain food? One particular dish that I find delicious, but am curious of who decided it was food, is any type of crustacean- more specifically: lobster. Take one look at a lobster and you see a pair of giant claws attached to a hard-shelled alien-like creature that dwells at the bottom of the sea. Was somebody stranded on an island and by some chance decided to boil a lobster, and then crack off the shell and enjoy the sweet meet on the inside? I like to think that lobster became a dish amongst people who lived on the ocean and ate it because it was in abundance, and over time the taste for lobster spread to the point of today where lobster is somewhat of a delicacy. All I am saying is that I question how the first person who ate a lobster, was able to look at that spiky, clawed, hard-shelled monster and say, “I think I am going to eat that”.
           
Another food that seems odd that people eat (to me anyway) is escargot, or snails. When I think of escargot, I think of a man in Paris eating snails at a café in view of the Eifel Tower. I am sure that many Americans look at snails and think it is disgusting that not only do people actually eat them, but they are very expensive and fancy. My brother tried escargot when he was in France and he said they were delicious. They may be the best tasting food in the world, but that does not excuse the fact that snails are slimy and ooze everywhere. It just seems strange that at some point in human history a man or woman decided to devour a slimy snail. Were they starving? Because snails are not too big in size, not enough to satisfy a man’s hunger anyway, and are not really abundant anywhere either.
           
Who knows how lobster and escargot came in to being as far as food goes, but we know now that they are both very fancy dishes. It is ironic that animals as ugly and monstrous looking as lobsters and snails could be such a delicacy today.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

W5: Our Fast Food Nation


Today people look at the fast food culture in America and may say, “Americans are fat and lazy and that is why fast food is such a big part of their culture.” I don’t believe that statements like these are necessarily true. Most Americans work hard and are extremely busy, so fast food exists not only to please the appetite of a lazy slob, but to cater to the palate of the busy worker. People do not even have step out of their car to get a full meal, making fast food a common choice for people on a time crunch, as well as lazy slobs. Also, the fact that fast food taste good and is relatively cheap helps out its popularity. Why is fast food so distinctly American? The reason is fast food originated in America, and other countries have a much richer food history. The United States is a relatively new country, so the culture of fast food is what Americans know. English people have their tea time, Italians have their big pasta dinners, the French have their crepes, and other European countries have their own food procedures. These countries have been eating and living like that for hundreds of years, so when fast food gained widespread notoriety in the U.S., these countries were not just going to stop what they have been doing for generations and jump on the fast food bandwagon. Because the U.S.’s food culture consists of hamburgers, hot dogs, and fast food joints, America is identified by fast food.

When I traveled to Germany, I stopped in a McDonald’s in downtown Munich and noticed a variety of differences compared to the ones in the U.S. Although they had the famous items like the big mac, the portions were much smaller than seen in the U.S. People also seemed to treat the McDonald’s like an internet café, sitting around drinking coffee and browsing the web on their laptops or smart phones, opposed to stuffing their faces with the food and leaving abruptly. The menu had food not seen in the U.S. McDonalds, specifically popcorn shrimp with tartar sauce that came in the same packets as the barbeque or honey mustard. A major difference was in order to use the bathroom; I had to deposit some money in to a turnstile. The bathrooms, along with the whole restaurant, were much cleaner than the McDonalds of the U.S. The Germans did not use McDonalds as a convenient and fast meal, but for the enjoyment of American cuisine. It is like they perceive McDonald’s differently; like it is a real restaurant as opposed to a fast food joint. And so instead of ordering, eating, and leaving in a fast and orderly manner, the Germans hung out a while and took their time. It only goes to show the cultural differences between Europe and the U.S. when it comes to fast food.